ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ПРОЦЕСУ РАДИКАЛІЗАЦІЯ СУСПІЛЬСТВА
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2075-7190.46.213240Ключові слова:
радикалізація, процес радикалізації, моделі радикалізації, причини радикалізації, дерадикалізація, контррадикалізаціяАнотація
Вивчено різні підходи до визначення радикалізації, її видів і моделей. Особлива увага приділяється вивченню причин радикалізації суспільства. З’ясовано, що радикалізація суспільства можлива в країнах з різним політичним режимом. Підкреслюється важливість і необхідність багатофакторного підходу до вивчення процесу радикалізації. Наведено конкретні приклади радикалізації, що підтверджують існування причинно-наслідковихзв’язків в політичних процесах.
Посилання
Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, De-Radicalisation, Counter-Radicalisation: A Conceptual Discussion and Literature Review. ICCT Research Paper. 97 р. Retrieved from http://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-Schmid-Radicalisation-De-Radicalisation- Counter-Radicalisation-March-2013.pdf
Borum, R. (2012). Rethinking radicalization. Journal of Strategic Security, 4, 1-6. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1150&context=jss
Vidino, L. (2010). Countering Radicalization in America: Lessons from Europe. Special Report 262. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/ SR262%20-%20Countering_Radicalization_in_America.pdf
Dawson, L. (2019). Clarifying the Explanatory Context for Developing Theories of Radicalization: Five Basic Considerations. Journal for deradicalization, 18, 146-184. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/191/145
Dawson, L. (2017). Sketch of a Social Ecology Model for Explaining Homegrown Terrorist Radicalisation. The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism - The Hague. ICCT Research Note. No 1. Retrieved from https://icct.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ ICCT-Dawson-Social-Ecology-Model-of-Radicalisation-Jan2017-2.pdf
Crettiez, X. (2016). Thinking about radicalization. A Processual Sociology of the Variables of Violent Engagement. Revue frangaise de science politique, 66(5), 709-727. Retrieved from https://www.cairn-int.info/revue-revue-francaise-de-science-politique- 2016-5-page-709.htm#
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding Political Radicalization: The Two-Pyramids Model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205-216. Retrieved from https:// www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-amp0000062.pdf
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2012). The Edge of Violence: Towards Telling the Difference Between Violent and Non-Violent Radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(1), 1-21.
Bj0rgo, T. (2016). Counter-terrorism as crime prevention: a holistic approach. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 8(1), 25-44.
Bacaj, E., Dumi, A., & £elo, e. (2015). Main Principles and Importance in Combating Terrorism at Nowdays Worldwide Focus Today. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 54-61. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/282602496_Main_Principles_and_Importance_in_Combating_Terrorism_ at_Nowdays_Worldwide_Focus_Today
Abdullah, W. J. (2017). Merits and Limits of Counter-ideological Work Against Terrorism: A Critical Appraisal. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 28(2), 291-308.
Argomaniz, J., & Vidal-Diez, A. (2015). Examining Deterrence and Backlash Effects in Counter-terrorism: The Case of ETA. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(1), 160-181.
Smith, A. G. (2018). How Radicalization to Terrorism Occurs in the United States: What Research Sponsored by the National Institute of Justice Tells Us. Washington: U. S. Department of Justice; Office of Justice Programs; National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250171.pdf
Behr, Von I., Reding, A., Edwards, C., & Gribbon, L. (2013). Radicalisation in the digital era. The use of the internet in 15 cases of terrorism and extremism. Cambridge, UK; Brussels, BE: RAND Europe. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/ rand/pubs/research_reports/RR400/RR453/RAND_RR453.pdf
Schlegel, L. (2018). Online-Radicalisation: Myth or Reality? Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung e. V. Facts & Findings. Counter-terrorism and Internal Security, 314. Retrieved from https://www.kas.de/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=baca4877-ac6c-4df4-ae77- 28b4ba2aafac&groupId=252038
Alava, S. (2018). Internet est-il un espace de radicalisation? Terminal, 123. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/terminal/3347
Odag, O., Leiser, A., & Boehnk, K. (2019). Reviewing the Role of the Internet in Radicalization Processes. Journal for deradicalization, 21, 261-300. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/289/197
Howard, T., Poston, B., & Benning, S. D. (2019). The Neurocognitive Process of Digital Radicalization: A Theoretical Model and Analytical Framework. Journal for deradicalization, 19, 122-146. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/ article/view/217/157
Ali, R. B. M., Moss, S. A., Barrelle, K., & Lentini, K. (2017). Initiatives that Counter Violent Radicalization but are Perceived as Suitable by Targeted Communities. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(1), 43-55.
Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F. M., Kruglanski, A. W., de Wolf, A., Mann, L., Feddes, A. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79-84. Retrieved from https://nvvb.nl/media/cms_page_media/694/ Terrorism%2C%20radicalization%20and%20de-radicalization.pdf
Josefsson, T., Nilsson, M., & Borell, K. (2017). Muslims Opposing Violent Radicalism and Extremism: Strategies of Swedish Sufi Communities. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 37(2), 183-195.
Pistone, I., Eriksson, E., Beckman, U., Mattson, C., & Sager, M. (2019). A scoping review of interventions for preventing and countering violent extremism: Current status and implications for future research. Journal for deradicalization, 19, 1-84. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/213/153
Freeman, E. A. (1873). Comparative politics: six lectures read before the Royal Institution in January and February, 1873 : with The unity of history : the Rede Lecture read before the University of Cambridge, May 29, 1872. London: Macmillan.
Algan, Y., Beasley, E., Cohen, D., Foucault, M., & Peron, M. (2019). Qui sont les Gilets jaunes et leurs soutiens? Observatoire du Bien-etre du CEPREMAP et CEVIPOF, 2019-03. Retrieved from http://www.cepremap.fr/depot/2019/02/2019-03-Qui-sont- les-Gilets-jaunes-et-leurs-soutiens-1.pdf
